In 2000, it seemed as if the whole world was reading the Harry Potter books. That did nothing to make me want to check them out. Truth be told, even though I was in my 30s and ought to have been well past any sense of adolescent nonconformity-for-the-sake-of-conformity, it made me less interested in checking them out. My sister told me, “Really, they’re really good!,” but someone in the grip of unacknowledged adolescent rebelliousness is likely to do the exact opposite of what her older sister recommends. I stayed steadily unintrigued. All those people lined up for the midnight release of the fourth book? Yawn. Even the discovery of a Harry-Potter-themed sermon online by a much-admired colleague and teacher, Ken Sawyer, didn’t draw me in, though I enjoyed the sermon.
Then a church member pressed the audiobooks of the first three books on me–I had a long commute and listened to books on tape all the time–and within the first few minutes, all my resistance crumbled. I loved them. I gulped them down, got a hold of the fourth, gulped it down too. They lived up to all the hype.
Oh, they’re conventional in many ways, and even the best of them has a plot hole you could fly a hippogriff through. And I’m angry with their author, who has torpedoed a deserved reputation as one of this planet’s kindest, most generous people by stubbornly insisting on a bigoted, mean mischaracterization of transgender. But the delights of these books are too many to list, and they keep on delighting me.
When I first discovered them, I sought out people who wanted to talk about them all the time, the way I did, and found them in the Yahoogroup Harry Potter for Grownups. I made good friends there, people I’m still friends with 20 years later, and among the funniest, smartest people in the group, I met the woman I would eventually fall in love with and marry. So Harry Potter changed my life in the most literal way possible. If I had continued to avoid it because it was so annoyingly ubiquitous and adored, Joy and I wouldn’t be married, we wouldn’t have our child . . . it’s scary even to think about it.
It’s rare for anything to live up to its reputation when it’s as widely hailed and appreciated as Harry Potter. But once in a while it does. Listen to my cautionary tale, dear reader. Do not deprive yourself of a greatly hyped cultural phenomenon just because it’s a greatly hyped cultural phenomenon.
The other work that has inspired me to say, “It lives up to all the hype, and more,” is Hamilton. Yes, it won 11 Tonys after being nominated for a record-setting 16 (inspiring this pre-Trump parody by Randy Rainbow). Its composer, Lin-Manuel Miranda, has won Tonys, Emmys, Grammys, the Pulitzer Prize and a MacArthur “genius” Fellowship, well before the age of 40. Its songs have been quoted by countless articles and as the title of a self-serving book by a wingnut who managed to become National Security Advisor and still undermine U.S. national security. It caused millions of middle-class white people to enjoy hip hop; millions of people who would never cross the threshold of an opera house to enjoy an opera; and countless people who don’t love musical theater to be unable to stop singing its tunes. Doctor Who predicts that it will be performed by 900 different casts over time, all of which the Doctor will see. Despite its near-universal popularity . . .
. . . it really is that good.
So, dear reader, don’t believe that the hype is wrong. Once in a while, something comes along that lives up to its stratospheric reputation. Heed my tale of narrowly-averted woe, and if there’s something you’ve been avoiding (despite the recommendations of people you respect) because it’s just too popular, give it a try. I won’t guarantee that you will meet the love of your life, but it might change your life, which is what art is all about.
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 4, 2020 at 11:07 pm
Beth Nord
Well, I was just about to ask you how you met Joy. As a retired children’s librarian, I’m glad you enjoyed the series.
LikeLike
July 5, 2020 at 7:17 am
Amy Zucker Morgenstern
I don’t think either of us could be married to someone who didn’t read lots and lots. What would we talk about? 😉
LikeLike
July 5, 2020 at 11:25 pm
Andrew Mackay
The Rev. Ken Sawyer who served in Wayland, MA? That’s my home congregation now (and I’m lucky to be sponsored by them in my path to fellowship and ministry).
JK Rowling’s comments on trans people, which are getting worse with time (essentially treating transitioning young as akin to conversion therapy), which has complicated my relationship with the books. I was about Harry’s age throughout the series, and identified with the struggles of adolescence that run in parallel to the whole fighting evil personified thing. It has shone a spotlight on how transphobic many prominent Britons are, especially writers and columnists are, and how many of them are frozen in a second-wave feminism mindset that cannot incorporate trans women into the framework of oppression and liberation.
LikeLike
July 16, 2020 at 6:06 pm
Amy Zucker Morgenstern
Yes, transphobia is far from gone from the US, but British feminism seems to be stuck in an essentialist phase that contributes to a toxic transphobia. Or else the transphobia is making them cling to biological essentialism–not sure.
Same Ken! He was a wonderful teacher.
LikeLike
July 20, 2020 at 4:09 am
Andrew Mackay
I noticed the Harper’s Letter that circulated about “cancel culture” (thought it’s a very vague letter that was supposed to appeal to a wider group of people) had people like Rowling and Jesse Singal as signatories. The podcast Citations Needed, a wonderful podcast about media bias and ideology, posited that a lot of that letter was attempting to help shore up the transphobes. The media class in both the US and UK are at the very least skeptical of transgender people, and are willing to run things like The Atlantic’s front page feature on teens “detransitioning” by Singal that was harshly criticized as stoking a type of hysteria along with conservatives talking about restrooms (which some liberal feminists continue to do as well).
I feel that trans rights is the cutting edge of the civil rights movement. There is no ‘civil rights movement’, in light of the John Lewis, a member of the movement that gets capitalized in textbooks. Every groups fights a sometimes lonely fight for acceptance. We’re in another racial justice movement now, with different tactics and goals. But trans people have a lot of prominent people who either oppose them or at least don’t speak up.
A trans minister I know has said (I don’t know about this) that Beacon Press in the past has published feminist literature by second wave feminists who have come out as anti-trans later in their careers. There hasn’t been any real comment on this, besides being noticed by trans people.
LikeLike