A radio story interviewed prospective voters in the GOP Iowa caucuses, coming up in a couple of weeks, to answer the breathless question of who would be the Mike Huckabee of 2012–Rick Santorum? Michele Bachmann? Ron Paul? The reporter did not ask why anyone would want to be the Mike Huckabee of 2012.
Huckabee, of course, did not get his party’s nomination in 2008. Nor are Bachmann or Santorum or Paul likely to get it this year, even if one of them wins in Iowa. Caucuses, even more than most primary processes, favor the extremes, and the GOP has seldom gone with its rightmost option. Yet here is the Iowa caucus, threatening to knock out what passes for a centrist in the Republican party in favor of whoever can please right-wing evangelicals the most.
So I went and looked up just how much of a bellwether Iowa has been for the GOP. It’s not impressive, but it’s not bad. Asterisks indicate the winner of the nomination.
- 2008 – Mike Huckabee
- 2004 – George W. Bush*
- 2000 – George W. Bush*
- 1996 – Bob Dole*
- 1992 – George H. W. Bush*
- 1988 – Bob Dole
- 1984 – Ronald Reagan*
- 1980 – George H. W. Bush
- 1976 – Gerald Ford*
Six out of the last nine Iowa winners won the nomination. But it doesn’t look even that good when you take out the candidates who ran unopposed: Reagan in 1984, George H. W. Bush in 1992, and George W. Bush in 2004. That leaves six years of contested caucuses, with only three predicting the eventual winner.
- 2008 – Mike Huckabee
- 2000 – George W. Bush*
- 1996 – Bob Dole*
- 1988 – Bob Dole
- 1980 – George H. W. Bush
- 1976 – Gerald Ford*
I don’t think any Republican candidate should lose sleep over losing in Iowa. What we all might lose sleep over is why the party gives so much power to the extremists who can’t get their favorites to win on the national stage. In 2008, John McCain rose to prominence as an honorable moderate (a reputation he subsequently threw away by embracing every crazy idea, not to mention every crazy VP candidate, that came along–he’s scrapped the rest of his principles since, in his determination to oppose anything supported by the man who defeated him). This year, who of that description has survived even to the first primary?
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 20, 2011 at 8:05 am
Bill Baar
I participated in the first caucus in 1972. It’s not a bad process and Iowans not a bad choice to go first. It’s an easy state to do retail politics in, and Iowans the kind of people to look at candidates hard, and then get out on a Jan evening and trek down to a hall for a couple of hours. They actually stand in different corners of the room for each candidate and someone counts heads.
LikeLike
December 20, 2011 at 9:01 am
Amy Zucker Morgenstern
I like the sound of the process, too. The more participation, the better. But the media’s main interest in it is as a predictor of the overall race for the nomination, and it is not a particularly good predictor.
I also love the low-tech approach. In Vermont, at least when I last lived there in 2003, they still used paper ballots and counted them each by hand. Worked just fine.
LikeLike
December 20, 2011 at 10:04 am
Bill Baar
South Carolina is the predictor. The media may over do things a bit, but I don’t know of any serious observer of US politics who would put much stock into Iowa as a predictor. It can give a jump start for otherwise unknown candidates e.g. Obama. Obama’s whole strategy in the primaries revolved on working these caucus states v Hillary he went for the big electoral ones. That did work for Obama. But again, Iowa was just the start of that strategy. The process in Iowa by the way discourages more participation, particularly of the elderly and those who work swing shifts. You have to get out on a weekday evening often in a lot of snow: that drives away the old and night workers.
LikeLike
December 20, 2011 at 11:24 am
Amy Zucker Morgenstern
You’re right: South Carolina has picked (determined?) the nominee 6 of the last 6 contested Republican primaries.
Interesting point re: participation. I thought the caucuses took place over several days.
LikeLike