The Rev. Lillian Daniel, who is so often wise and measured, kicked up a duststorm on the internet a few years ago among people who think about spirituality, religion, and the communities that make them possible, when she published a piece on her denominational website that was neither measured nor wise. It was full of dubious statements such as “There is nothing challenging about having deep thoughts all by oneself” and pure nastiness such as “Please stop boring me” (the latter was a headline, so it might not have been her writing).
As my colleague Jeremy Nickel responded at the time, Unitarian Universalist congregations welcome people who describe themselves as “spiritual but not religious” (SBNR). Or we do to the extent that they aren’t put off by defensive and angry ministers.
Unfortunately because of messages like yours, instead of finding that safe space within our congregational walls, they have found them in Yoga and Meditation classes, book clubs, in small group ministry settings in friends homes, in volunteer associations and online in chat rooms and on blogs, and in countless other ways that all turn out not to be your church. And I think at this point, it is becoming pretty obvious why that is.
It is not, as you mockingly suggest, because they find themselves “uniquely fascinating,” but rather because they find us, and our congregations, predictably close-minded and judgmental.
I thought he eloquently said what I wanted to say on the subject, and pretty much hit it out of the park. But the “SBNR people are rabidly individualistic” meme is alive and well, and among people that hold the key to the problem in their hands, as I learned yesterday. I’m in a workshop on preaching and worship for the future church, by Mike Piazza of the Center for Progressive Renewal, formerly pastor of the largest LGBTQ congregation in the world, and it’s terrific, and I am inspired and aided by almost everything he says. He brought up the SBNR briefly, though, and made the same complaint about individualism. The applause made it clear that a lot of UUs agree with him.
I wasn’t clapping, because as irritating as “I can do it all by myself” religion is, I don’t think that it is the main impulse behind “I’m spiritual, but not religious.” My congregation is full of people who describe themselves the same way. Hell, I would describe myself the same way if I didn’t have a lifetime’s experience of religious community’s being a place for my spirit to flourish: a nurturer of spirituality, not its enemy. But that isn’t what many Americans think of when they hear “religion.” They hear–and this information was shared, later, by Rev. Piazza himself–
It’s judgmental.
It’s homophobic.
It’s boring.
People in churches demonize everything outside the churches. (Rev. Daniel walked right into that one.)
It sets itself up as an opponent of science and intellectual thought.
Now, it’s easy enough for me to see why someone would conclude that their spiritual life was not going to be helped along by such an institution. Your average American has very good reason to think that churches are hotbeds of judgment, homophobia, and anti-scientific superstition. And the Barna Group study that yielded the above responses (it’s titled “You Lost Me”) wasn’t even of people who haven’t ever gone to church–it was a study of young people who grew up in Christian churches and left. As for Unitarian Universalism, as Rev. Piazza challenged us, we are none of these things (except sometimes boring) and very few people know we exist. Whose fault is that, and who’s responsible for turning it around?
If people don’t know that there is a religion that affirms the explorations of science; that celebrates our whole lives including our sexuality, regardless of sexual orientation; that is not concerned with defending its own dogma and doctrines; well, it’s mostly because we have hidden our own light under a bushel for all these years. Too many of us, which is why I don’t give in to the temptation to lie about my profession on airplanes, but tell those who ask that I’m a Unitarian Universalist minister. And when they start witnessing to me about their faith, which happens as often as their saying “I’m spiritual but not religious,” I tell them about us: that my congregation welcomes humanists and atheists (including me) as well as theists and Christians, that we encourage people to follow their own spiritual impulses in community, that we see the Bible as a document created by and for humans, that science and our observations of nature are one of the sources of our tradition, and of course, that we unreservedly affirm LGBTQ people (again including me). The very public fight for gay rights is helping to undermine the stereotype, I think–many of us have turned the media framing of “gays versus religion” to “look, here are religions that support gays,” and all those photos in the press of UU ministers, in collars and stoles to make it abundantly clear that they are ministers, officiating at the weddings of same-sex couples, are surely having an impact. Now we also have to let everyone–those outside and those inside our walls–know that we are a home for deep spiritual exploration.
Which is to say, we need to make sure we’re not boring. Time for me to get back to my preaching and worship class.
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 4, 2015 at 8:52 am
Philip Stauber
“…that is narrowly concerned with defending its own dogma and doctrines;..” not? Edited–thank you! –AZM
LikeLike
February 4, 2015 at 10:46 am
Claire
Now we also have to let everyone–those outside and those inside our walls–know that we are a home for deep spiritual exploration.
Amen. Part of which is not sliding into the quicksand of “You got God-language on my non-theism!” and variants thereof, which still happen a lot more often than they need to. It can be done, but it takes leaders who are able and willing to nurture spiritual growth, and a congregational / community culture that is open to it. Yes. And if the congregational culture isn’t open to it, it takes leaders who are able and willing to challenge that and change it. If we’re a place for spiritual exploration and free of dogma, that means that some of the practices and beliefs of other congregation members are going to rub us the wrong way. I see our congregations as a workshop where we practice living in diverse community: not as diverse as the wider world’s, but diverse enough to make us each a bit uncomfortable at times. –AZM
LikeLike
February 4, 2015 at 5:27 pm
Laurel McClure
Spiritual but not religious–I suppose I would include myself in that category. To me, it has nothing to do with individualism vs communitarianism, but rather with a belief in God vs atheism. Many people think of “religious” as implying belief in God, so those of us who do not believe in a God reject the label. Are some Unitarian ministers offended by this rejection of the term because they assume it also implies rejection of the institutions within which UU communities exist?
Speaking for myself, I have been delighted to discover an institution in my local Unitarian Church that offers me the comforts and joys of community and ritual observances, songs and service, without requiring me to recite creeds I cannot believe. I think the disagreement is over terminology. Yes, there are some atheists who dislike the structure of a formal service, but many among us love it, and have missed it. We are happy to call ourselves Unitarian Universalists.
Sent from my iPad
Another interesting gloss, Laurel. I’m sure you speak for others in equating “religious” with “believing in God.” I don’t, so have no problem thinking of myself as religious, but I imagine that others do.
I’m so glad you’ve found us. –AZM
LikeLike
February 6, 2015 at 8:31 am
Andrew Hidas
Fine discussion here. I’d say, in response to Laurel, that for me at least, the “spiritual-but-not-religious” label fits both the God/no God AND the individual/communitarian polarities. I have come to use the label “a profoundly religious non-theist” when people ask about my religious outlook. I love church in all its communitarian ritual and commitment, even as I don’t believe in any God-as-being. But I have also come to be wary of SBNR when it seems to reflect an essentially privatized practice, centered on manicuring one’s own soul. That’s not the case with all SBNRs, by a long shot, but it’s an aspect that can creep into that perspective, and then manifest as anti-church. Meanwhile, it misses out on the richness presented by ongoing, committed spiritual community, which is not easily replicated in book groups, bowling leagues, devotion to sport teams, and the many other flavors of sublimated “civil religion” in the modern world.
LikeLike
February 6, 2015 at 10:17 am
Laurel
What do you all think of the Sunday Assembly movement? I have never attended one of these events, but they seem to me to be an attempt by athiests and maybe agnostics to develop an institution that provides ritual and community and service, much of what most of us find in church, within a framework that is explicitly non-“religious.”
I am also drawn to regular attendance at services by the implicit or explicit invitation to contemplate a world and a universe that are larger than just myself, and to which I am connected with every particle of my being. This can engender a sense of awe, which does not require belief in God or heaven, but it is a feeling that both fills me up and expands my limited individual notion of my place in the universe.
LikeLike
February 6, 2015 at 10:06 am
Celebrating the good, debating political correctness, and more « uuworld.org : The Interdependent Web
[…] The Rev. Amy Zucker Morgenstern thinks too many of us hide the light of Unitarian Universalism under a bushel. […]
LikeLike