That’s the minimum wage in Santa Clara County, California, where “the self-sufficiency standard for two adults, one preschooler, and one school age child is $77,973.” So if both of those adults both hold down two minimum-age jobs, they can attain self-sufficiency. (Data from the Insight Center for Economic Community Development, via Step Up Silicon Valley.)
Minimum wage stagnates while the cost of living rises
Setting the minimum wage far below the poverty level is one of the biggest pieces of corporate welfare we Americans fund. Instead of businesses paying people a living wage, they pay wages at which a full-time worker–or even two full-time workers–can’t support a family, and the taxpayers step in to fill the gap with welfare programs. Or, more usually, the gap just stays a gap.
Some San Jose State students who were working at a community services center started wondering why so many people who had full-time jobs were still coming into the center for help with food, rent, and other necessities. Once they investigated, the reason became obvious, and they took action. They and a coalition of other organizations in the city–and its county, where my congregation is also located–started to press for an increase in the minimum wage, from the current $8 to $10.
If you’re in Santa Clara County, please send this letter to the San Jose City Council, which will be considering the $10 minimum wage at a meeting next Tuesday. Better yet, sign the letter and go to the meeting. And even better than that, sign the letter, go to the meeting, and send a donation to Raise the Wage San Jose. If you’re elsewhere, you can look up your state or city’s minimum wage–in many places, it’s no higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25–and multiply it by 2000. What annual income are folks are expected to live on in your area? Do you think it’s feasible?
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 17, 2012 at 6:14 am
Joel Monka
If it takes $37.48/hour for a family to live, why are you asking for a minimum wage of $10.00/hour? It won’t change the amount of community services they need and will raise the prices of goods and services they are buying. Will it really help to go from 21% of what they need to 26% of what they need? Joel: I wasn’t in on the strategy sessions, but if I had been, I would have assumed several things: (1) The US economy does not operate on a “to each according to his/her needs” approach (though Dan Quayle, of all people, once suggested that people with children should be paid more for the same work. Must’ve been reading Capital), so the best we could hope for would be a wage that would be livable for a single person–not that $10 is enough for that either; (2) Minimum-wage increases meet with such resistance that a 25% increase, even way overdue, is about as much as one can hope for; (3) Since this is one municipality, albeit one of the largest in the country, it is prone to “race to the bottom” pressures–if it exceeds its neighbors by too much, employers will move somewhere that allows them to pay a poverty wage; (4) Even the most willing employer can’t absorb a huge change in expenses immediately, though of course if that were the only issue, one could insist on a larger increase and build in a long lead-up time; (5) I’ve been broke in my time, and believe me, $80/week more would have made a huge difference. –AZM
May 6, 2014 at 3:40 pm
A 25% raise in the minimum wage = what results? | Sermons in Stones
[…] years ago I wrote about the call for an increase in the minimum wage in San Jose from $8 to $10. It was finally passed, […]